Do Better, Sir: A Response to Stephen A. Smith’s Misinformed Commentary

Stephen A. Smith built his career on bold, unapologetic takes, usually in the realm of sports. When he sticks to what he knows, his commentary is entertaining, insightful, and sharp. But when he steps outside of that arena and ventures into politics and social issues, he stumbles — often spectacularly. His latest tirade about the Department of Justice’s Inspector General (IG) report on FBI informants present during the January 6th Capitol riot wasn’t just wrong — it was reckless.

Instead of offering clarity, Stephen A. muddied the waters, parroting dangerous misinformation that ultimately undermines the Black community and the fight for truth. This isn’t about being “layered” or “nuanced”; this is about being responsible with your platform. And Stephen A. failed, big time.

Stephen A.’s Platform Deserves Better

Stephen A. Smith’s reach is massive. He has the power to shape narratives, challenge systemic injustices, and elevate the voices of those who need it most. But with great influence comes great responsibility. When he implied that the DOJ report vindicated right-wing conspiracy theories or made Trump “look right,” he didn’t just miss the mark — he took a wrecking ball to it.

Let’s break down his claims, point by point, and correct them with facts straight from the DOJ Inspector General’s report.

1. “The Democrats Downplayed January 6th”.

Correction:

Absolutely false. The DOJ report affirms the severity of January 6th as a violent insurrection and acknowledges the FBI’s preparation for potential violence.

“The FBI recognized the potential for violence and took significant and appropriate steps to prepare for this supporting role,” and this can be found on page 4 of the report.

DOJ, Inspector General Report on FBI’s Handling of January 6th, P. 4

Reality Check: Democratic leaders didn’t downplay anything. From the moment the attack occurred, they underscored the danger it posed to democracy. Stephen A.’s assertion is a dangerous distortion that gives cover to those who want to minimize the insurrection.

The insurrection was real — period.

3. “FBI Informants Were Involved in Illegal Activity”.

Correction:

False. Yes, 26 FBI informants (Confidential Human Sources, or CHSs) were present in D.C. on January 6th, but none were directed to engage in illegal activity.

“None of these FBI CHSs were authorized to enter the Capitol or a restricted area, or to otherwise break the law”.

DOJ, Inspector General Report on FBI’s Handling of January 6th, P.4

Reality Check: The FBI did not orchestrate the attack. The violence was driven by individuals who were radicalized by false claims about the 2020 election. Stephen A.’s claim is pure conspiracy nonsense.

The FBI did not orchestrate January 6th — period.

4. “This Report Proves the FBI Set Up January 6th”.

Correction:

Misleading and laughable. The DOJ report makes it clear that there was no FBI plot to incite violence. The presence of informants does not mean they orchestrated the attack.

“Our review did not identify any potentially critical intelligence in the FBI’s possession as of January 6 that had not been provided to, or was not otherwise known to law enforcement stakeholders prior to January 6″.

DOJ, Inspector General Report on FBI’s Handling of January 6th, P. 5

Reality Check: Stephen A.’s insinuation (and them stupid ass air quotes) that this was a “setup” plays into the hands of those who want to rewrite history. The facts say otherwise.

5. “Trump’s Claims About a Rigged Process Are Valid”.

Correction:

Completely wrong. The report doesn’t validate Trump’s claims of a rigged election. It focuses solely on FBI intelligence failures, not election integrity.

“Our review did not identify any potentially critical intelligence in the FBI’s possession as of January 6 that had not been provided to, or was not otherwise known to law enforcement stakeholders prior to January 6″.

DOJ, Inspector General Report on FBI’s Handling of January 6th, P. 5

Reality Check: Trump’s claims were baseless then, and they are baseless now. Stephen A.’s commentary does nothing but give dangerous lies more air.

Trump’s lies remain lies — period.

Why This Matters

When figures like Stephen A. Smith amplify misinformation, they become unwitting tools for those who want to sow division and confusion. Instead of helping the Black community navigate the complexities of systemic issues, he feeds the very narratives that hold us back. As Roland Martin succinctly put it, “Stephen A., you know sports. On this, you don’t know what the hell you’re talking about”.

The Responsibility of Influence

Having a platform means you are responsible for what you put out into the world. Stephen A. has the opportunity to challenge falsehoods, uplift truth, and advocate for justice. Instead, he dropped the ball and fumbled his way through a topic he clearly didn’t understand. If he can’t engage responsibly, maybe he really should stick to sports.

Stephen A., you love to say you’re “sick of it” when you launch into one of your rants. Well, guess what? Good. Because some of us are starting to get sick of you when you wander into topics clearly outside of your expertise.

Stick to sports, my guy — or better yet, read a report and get your facts straight first. Leave the real conversations to those who did their homework.